Crimea: occupation officials in full denial mode on Human Rights Watch report

article1662.w_l

 

2014/11/22 • Crimea

Human Rights Watch has released an eight-page report on “Rights in Retreat” in Crimea since the Anschluss, and the occupation authorities have gone into full-denial mode in response, dismissing the report as lacking “objective confirmation” and containing only “empty talk.”

In an interview with Moscow’s “Gazeta” yesterday, Sergey Aksyonov, prime minister of the occupation regime, said that the report not only was baseless but offensive because it called Russian power in Crimea an “occupation” regime.

He said that the report’s statements about the disappearances of Crimean Tatar were simply wrong, noting that according to his information, one of those listed as “disappeared” had in fact committed suicide. Claiming otherwise, as HRW does, is thus nothing more than propaganda against Russia.

Aksyonov said that international human rights groups should be paying attention to what he described as “the violation of human rights and mass murder” by Ukrainian forces in the Donetsk and Luhansk “republics” rather than focusing on Crimea where he said conditions are good and improving.

His comments were seconded and expanded upon by Lyudmila Lubina, the human rights plenipotentiary in Crimea, in comments to the Russian news media.  She too said the HRW report “does not correspond to reality” and criticized in particular the report’s statement that the number of kidnappings of Crimean Tatars is going up.

Lubina said that Ukrainian officials had not defended human rights in Crimea, but no one investigated them. Now that the peninsula is part of Russia, all of them are racing to do so, a pattern that she said called into question the purposes of those compiling and distributing such reports.

In her efforts to dismiss the issue of disappearances among the Crimean Tatars, however, Lubina in fact provided information showing that that problem is even greater than HRW and other monitors have said.  “Only 18” of the “more than 800” missing in Ukraine are Crimean Tatars, she said.

While that means that the Crimean Tatars are suffering this crime at a rate somewhat less than their share in the population, Lubin’s figures also mean that others, presumably ethnic Ukrainians or members of other minorities, are suffering disproportionately and at relatively high levels.

Source: windowoneurasia.blogspot.com

Tags: , ,

  • Michel Cloarec

    Why should russian bother about HRW, they have their own definition of what is human rights ! Humanitarian convoys are good example ! They can move what they want in and out of Donbas ! Not to forget the ” non in Ua dead soldiers ”
    Human rights, does not exist in their dictionary ! Or there is no dictionary !

  • Paul P. Valtos

    For 70 some years Russia has had a dictionary of accepted Western definitions of words but Russia has printed a version which id diametrically opposed to Western definitions. One perfect example is the German Democratic Republic which is called democratic but, in fact was a subject dictatorship of the Soviet Union. I would like to hear a debate between an American lawyer and a Russian lawyer on any subject the Russians might cook up.

  • Dirk Smith

    muscovites are showing their true colors, which is to be mankind’s barbarians. Further evidenced by their high alcoholism/smoking rates, xenophobia against Tartars, gays, Chechens, journalists, Ukrainians, etc., endemic misogyny, etc. Putin’s supporters are the untermensch or lumpenproletariat of Russian society.