Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Sanctions against Russia: soft and fluffy

Image: Christo Komar / allvoices.com

I really want to write about the new sanctions, but there is nothing new to write about. Essentially, everything was written by me back on March 11 in the article “What will happen to Russia after the annex of Crimea: the victory of the West.” Four and a half months have gone by, everything I wrote about has emerged clearly and does not evoke any doubt. We only have to repeat and add new details.

We continue existing in the world of a victorious oxymoron. On one hand, there are new sanctions, on the other, they sound horrible, but they are quite harmless in the short-term. What does it mean, to stop giving state banks money in Europe for three months? And they were going to accept it during these three months? What does it mean not to sell us new oil industry equipment, if our companies have no money for modernizations, and we make most of our purchases in China anyway? How will the population feel the limit on weapons sales to Russia (and whom will Russia itself with these weapons)?

It seems the US and EU don’t understand what they are doing. It is known that the weak pokes only serve to anger the enemy. Being a hostage to the primitive model of Russian society, Putin may want to, but he cannot leave the separatists for dead now – because they will say it’s because of the sanctions! If we judge by the tone of discussions in Russia, the result of the sanctions will not be the social rejection of Russian government action but the consolidation of society against the actions of the US and the EU.

It would seem that to break Russia’s stubbornness, taking into account its governments lack of opportunity to lose face before their people, they would have to talk quietly to the Russian President and make an agreement (with threats and convincing at the same time, but let him save face), or strike him to defeat – impose the harshest sanctions possible (like bans on airline flights, supplies of spare parts for planes, state bank account freezing etc.) – everything everyone would immediately feel. Why is this not happening?

The answer is very simple. We have an erroneous perception of the international situation. For us, the center are the events in Ukraine, and the sides of the conflict are trying to win on this theatrical stage of combat – Russia wants to create Novorossiya and preserve Crimea and the US and EU want to fight for the integrity of Ukraine. In reality, this is not the case at all.

There are three central issues. The gas market and system of making global political decisions are the central issues of the US government. Stability of their own government is the central issue for the Russian leadership. Ukraine is simply a field for the game, the EU is the judge who gives the prize to the US in case of success, the Russian people are the judge who gives the prize to the Russian government, also in case of success.

The task of the US government is to preserve Russia’s part as “the bad guy,” which may allow them access to the European gas market, having taken it away from Russia (and a number of small markets – raw materials, weapons, etc.), and get rid of the pleasure of listening to Russia in the process of multilateral international talks. The EU is ready to join the US, but only if this action receives mass support from the European electorate, and this means that Russia has to be “the bad guy.”

The Russian government ended up on the US’ hook half a year ago, but, it seems, having understood the “unexpected” benefits from the situation, it easily exchanged economical losses for a significant rise in popularity within the company. De facto the US and Russian governments are game partners, only their prizes are different. The situation sits well for all the players (let us not consider the Ukrainian government the victim: Ukraine is going through unbelievable consolidation of the population around Kyiv; war with Russia will give Kyiv the opportunity to write off all the difficulties and losses from the economic reforms without evoking “the people’s anger,” rather channeling it towards Russia; finally, Kyiv will of course receive significant financial support from the EU).

Can harsh sanctions be imposed in this situation? Of course not – really harsh sanctions will be saved as a last resort in case Russia violates the rules of the game as of today, its withdrawal from the current partnership with the US – for example, the attempts at open military intervention of Russia in Ukraine. In case they are imposed today (or tomorrow), first, there is a risk of Russia retaliating in kind (what can Putin do in order to preserve power in the country with a decaying financial and transportation system? Only start war against Ukraine); second, the risk of Russia’s capitulation, the return to the status quo and the loss of the EU gas market for the US. Neither is all right with the US.

What will happen next? I think the war in Ukraine will survive for another two-three months – the way events are developing, there is no doubt that the ATO troops are capable of solving the problem within this term. Within this time they will increase the sanctions a couple of times more (for the western voter to see the concern of the government), however they will be just as fluffy. For example, they will ban loans to the biggest state companies for three months. Within three months the EU will conclude that the war is over, Russia is not helping the terrorists anymore, which means that the sanctions worked. The electorate will be satisfied with the efficient actions of the government and will want to exclude the possibility of economical damage to themselves. In accordance with their wish, the EU will cancel the sanctions (besides the personal ones that have to do with arming and high-technological production). It seems the US will do the same, for the same reasons. In parallel, as the issue of Crimea has not gone anywhere, the US will put pressure, and the EU will agree to the program of decreasing Russian gas dependence, and Russia will be non grata in educated political parties like “G something” and will not influence their decisions.

The Russian government today cannot stop lending aid to the terrorists (showing weakness means fall of support), nor increase it (there is no “national” support in Russia in the issue of deploying the army, if they do resort to it, they have to win the war quickly, while “cargo 200” has not changed the attitude of the population towards the government, and the chances of this are not obvious, this is not war against the Georgian army, and the NATO might help).

The Russian government will only heave a sigh of relief after the war is over. It will sigh and report to the electorate that: a) they prevented the war and was not subject to provocations; b) will consequentially fight the Ukrainian fascist junta and protect Russian rights henceforth; c) everything is so bad in Ukraine that they shouldn’t even be fought, they have almost ceased to exist; d) let them go to Gay-Europe, fewer problems for us; e) no sanctions could break us, the recent events, including the cancellation of sanctions are a testament to the defeat of the US and the EU.

And everyone will be satisfied, excluding those who died in the nightmare in the east of Ukraine, who died to change the gas suppliers to Europe, and the Russian government who has led the country into an economical dead-end in the last 15 years, increased its rating and postponed the logical end of its reign.

And for another three-four years Crimea will be ours (and the money will go to them, and the fleet will be in Sevastopol surrounded by three NATO members and two of its allies without supply channels), oil will be expensive, the economy will stagnate or be in a state of recession, the taxes will keep growing, the level of life will slowly decrease, the gas pipeline to China will be under construction, in sum everything will be good. And Europe will be constructing gas dilution terminals, lower the percentage of gas in producing electricity and prepare to refuse Russian supplies. And the US will increase gas extraction and lower its value. And the NATO will cooperate with Ukraine and look closer at the polygons near Sumy for missiles just in case. And Iran will be slowly leaving the sanctions and preparing to increase oil supplies. And Tesla will build electrical charging stations and perfect its cars, and other car producers (which will receive its patents for free) will begin programs to transition to the production of electrical cars as their main produce.

I won’t write what happens next. Some consider it obvious, and some will never believe me. Why did I write this? Oh yes, to say that there will be no catastrophic sanctions. There’s no point in saving bread, hiding dollars under your pillow, selling your apartment and fleeing. Not this year. Better yet, think of what to do within three-four years.

Source: Slon

Translated by Mariya Shcherbinina

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!
Total
0
Shares
Related Posts

January 8: Up to 7.5 thousand Russian soldiers are located in Donbas at any given moment

Maidan Community Sector, Lviv: Dear friends!

January 8 – Eleventh "humanitarian aid convoy" has the border with Ukraine from Russia avoiding proper control, – informed NSDC spokesman Andriy Lysenko. They are again transporting weapons to Ukraine and dead bodies to Russia.

January 8 – Up to 7.5 thousand Russian soldiers are located in Donbas at any given moment; they are constantly rotated, – said Ukraine's Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak.

January 8 – The Head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov believes that Mikhail Khodorkovsky (who is Jewish and a Russian opposition member) has declared himself to be an "enemy of all Muslims of the world" and his personal enemy.

January 8 – Donetsk airport and its surroundings were the sites of the most intense fighting within ATO area, – informs ATO press center. The militants opened fire 16 times and shelled Ukrainian positions using mortars and artillery, including "Grad" rocket launchers.

January 8 – Former leader of Donetsk militants Igor Strielkov (Hirkin) has urged Russia not to "bury its head in the sand" and recognize that it is at war with Ukraine.

January 8 – A special monitoring mission of OSCE in a report, published on the evening of January 6 notes the deterioration of the situation in Donbas. According to the information provided by OSCE, during the 24-hour period from January 4 to January 5, there were recoded 69 violations of the cease fire regime. 32 of these were observed to be from the side of the Ukrainian army, whereas 37 were from the side of the separatists. The most intensive fighting took place at Donetsk Airport, at the southern entrance to the village of Pisky and in the village itself. Also shots happened in the region of the residential areas of Nikishyn, Chornukhyne and Debaltse – in the villages of Ridkodub, Kam'ianka, and Horodyshche.

Ukraine's economy:No Christmas presents

...the hryvnia, lost about half its value, inflation is now touching 25%, the government is fast running out of cash, Ukrainian bond yields increased to a record high this week, financial markets are preparing for a default.

Andreas Umland and Kostyantyn Fedorenko

Why and How Brussels May Help Kyiv: Ten Western Policy Proposals to Save the Ukrainian State

George Soros

A New Policy to Rescue Ukraine

Oleg Orlov

Ukraine's Forgotten City Destroyed by War

Pervomaisk has been reduced to rubble in the fighting between government troops and rebel forces, and at least half of its population has fled. Russian human rights campaigner Oleg Orlov was granted rare access to the area.

Peacemaker/ Myrotvorets

A new website sponsored by Ukraine's Ministry of Internal Affairs has collected information on some 9,000 Russian mercenaries, soldiers, and other militants who are involved in Russia's aggression in the Donbas. According to MIA advisor Anton Herashchenko, much of this information has been supplied by Russian citizens themselves.

P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.

February 23: UN peacekeeping mission to Ukraine is possible – said German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier

Le 23 février – "Au cours des dernières 24 heures, deux soldats ukrainiens ont été tués dans la zone d'opération anti-terroriste, dix autres sont blessés." a déclaré le colonel Valentyn Feditchev.

Le 23 février – "La Russie n'a pas su instaurer la trêve après les accords de Minsk-2, alors nous devons envisager des sanctions plus lourdes et la livraison d'armes à l'Ukraine." a déclaré l'eurodéputé Jacek Saryusz-Wolski "Bruxelles doit comprendre qu'il est temps d'imposer plus de sanctions et d'autres mesures contre la Russie. Il s'agit de livrer des armes de haute technologie à l'Ukraine – des missiles de précision, des missiles anti-char, de l'équipement anti-aérien, des armes que possèdent principalement les Français, les Britanniques et les Américains."

Le 23 février – "Si les accords de Minsk ne sont pas respectés, nous risquons de voir la déstabilisation d'autres régions en Ukraine." – déclaration du ministre des Affaires étrangères de la Roumanie, Bogdan Aurescu. Il fait surtout référence aux régions voisines de la Roumanie – la Bessarabie, la Bucovine et la Transcarpatie.

Le 23 février – "La Pologne est prête à participer aux missions de maintien de la paix dans l'est de l'Ukraine, mais cette mission doit être précédée par une trêve réelle et une décision concrète de l'ONU." a déclaré le ministre polonais des Affaires étrangères Grzegorz Schetyna.

Le 23 février – "Le gouvernement fédéral de l'Allemagne s'inquiète que le cessez-le-feu ne soit pas respecté." a déclaré le porte-parole du gouvernement allemand, Steffen Seibert.

Le 23 février – "Il est possible d'organiser une mission de maintien de la paix des Nations Unies en Ukraine, mais c'est une question de temps." a déclaré le ministre allemand des Affaires étrangères Frank-Walter Steinmeier dans une interview au magazine Bild.

Le 23 février – La hryvnia ukrainienne est tombée de 29.25 à 32 hryvnia vis-à-vis du dollar – chute record en une journée.

Le 23 février – Afin de stabiliser la monnaie nationale, la Banque nationale d'Ukraine a décidé d'interdire les paiements en devises de plus de $500.000 dollars sans une lettre de crédit de la banque étrangère.

Laurence Parisot: il faut sauver l'Ukraine

Poutine en guerre contre l'Europe

P.S.: Faîtes circuler cet appel, SVP!